I was filled with horror as I read an article in The Independent (http://news.independent.co.uk/world/politics/article341967.ece) about how the UN’s Development Program (UNDP) has figured out how to raise 7 trillion dollars to fix all the problems in the world.
Half is to come from the United States, essentially a tax on the US for the burden placed upon the global environment. This is the most interesting part of the scheme. The UN is proposing to offer ‘pollution credits’, which can be purchased by those who will exceed Kyoto Protocol agreements. The money paid for these credits would then be used by the UN to save the world.
The other half, roughly, would basically come from restructuring debts in the 3rd world. I’m simplifying this part, but this seems an accurate description.
The 2005 budget for the UN is 1.8 billion, with a B. So, being generous, the UN is talking about handling monies 3500 times larger than their annual budget. The horror I feel stems from my belief that the UN, as an organization, is unaccountable to anyone yet wants to control a huge amount of money. The UN is already suffering from admitted serious corruption problems; I can’t imagine what this would cause. Furthermore, spending that much money is not easy… there is only so much you can buy without raising prices dramatically.
Back to that part about Kyoto. The United States would have to sign onto Kyoto (or something very similar). This effectively shackles the United States (there is a reason every U.S. Senator voted against it 95–0, in 1997, including Kerry, Lieberman and McCain) without imposing similar limits and controls on other nations, such as China. Basically, this plan will be largely financed by the United States.
One last item; the one that scares me the most (quote from the Independent): “…the nation-state is an old-fashioned concept that has no role to play in a modern globalised world…” The article implies that, in order to move forward with this grand scheme, national soverignty would be done away with.
The nation-state came into being with the Treaty of Westphalia, in 1648 (go read some history, or lacking the time, visit http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Westphalia). Giving up this concept of national sovreignty implies surrendering the U.S. constitution, and all the rights and privileges that I enjoy.
I am filled with tremendous unease.