More All-New Olympic events

August 22nd, 2008 § 0

My pre­vi­ous post about a few of the less-than-mainstream Olympic events sparked a wave of feed­back and sug­ges­tions.
My wife thought it would be great if, dur­ing the Track and Field relay events, the run­ners used a real baton and had to twirl it as they ran. Another par­tic­i­pant in this con­ver­sa­tion extended this idea so as to include pink and sil­ver tas­sels on the batons– how pretty that would be!
Base jump­ing, hang glid­ing, caber toss­ing, wing­suit fly­ing, street luge, park­our, darts and BASE jump­ing have been a few of the more rec­og­niz­able sports.
But… how about:

Odd sports, all.
Which raises the ques­tion, what is the most unusual sport on the planet?
I pro­pose Wife Car­ry­ing.

The pinnacle

August 19th, 2008 § 1

I’ve been say­ing this for years now, but am only now get­ting around to post­ing this thought online.

Mankind has reached the pin­na­cle of soci­ety. Actu­ally, we prob­a­bly reached it around 1980, give or take a decade.
It is this: Air con­di­tion­ing, tele­vi­sion and beer. These three things keep Amer­i­cans (and other west­ern cul­tures) sedate and com­pla­cent. Take one away, and every­thing will come unglued.
“Why should I go out there and protest? It’s much more com­fort­able here, in my Lazy Boy.” These three com­forts rep­re­sent the pin­na­cle of soci­ety. After obtain­ing these lux­u­ries– really, what is there to com­plain about?
Think about it. Where do we see mass protests? Coun­tries where this magic recipe is incom­plete. In west­ern coun­tries, in the rare rally or demon­stra­tion, who is involved? Largely the poor, or peo­ple who eschew the ben­e­fits of mod­ern life. (Yeah, you gra­nola I-don’t-eat-it-if-it-casts-a-shadow peo­ple, I’m talk­ing about you.) Lets call these ABC — Air con­di­tion­ing, Beer and Cable TV. There are vari­a­tions, of course, but it cap­tures the essen­tials.
The dan­ger is, gov­ern­ments are aware of this fact, and will exploit it. This sounds evil, but the iron law will require it. Gov­ern­ment will expand and increase its pow­ers, and it will do so along the path of least resis­tance. Gov­ern­ments have already learned they can do almost any­thing, so long as ABC is pre­served.
Ask your­self this ques­tion: what are you will­ing to let peo­ple get away with, if they leave your ABC alone?

Solutions — continued

August 19th, 2008 § 0

In a pre­vi­ous post, I dis­cussed how deficit spend­ing causes infla­tion. I’d like to take a moment now to talk about money itself. Get your popcorn.

Remem­ber, the paper dol­lar is a Fed­eral Reserve Note. This is not the same as a dol­lar. The descrip­tion of the Fed­eral Reserve Note from the U.S. Trea­sury web­site is revealing:

Fed­eral Reserve notes are not redeemable in gold, sil­ver or any other com­mod­ity, and receive no back­ing by any­thing. This has been the case since 1933. The notes have no value for them­selves, but for what they will buy. In another sense, because they are legal ten­der, Fed­eral Reserve notes are “backed” by all the goods and ser­vices in the economy.

In other words, the value of the dol­lar is rep­re­sented by the econ­omy of the United States. More specif­i­cally, by the tax­ing author­ity of the United States Gov­ern­ment– the abil­ity of the gov­ern­ment to pay its debts and oblig­a­tions. Viewed another way, a Fed­eral Reserve Note is equiv­a­lent to a share of stock in a cor­po­ra­tion. Just as shares of stock can rise and fall in value, the value of the dol­lar can change, too.

Deficit spend­ing is sim­i­lar in effect to that of a cor­po­ra­tion issu­ing more shares. The over­all value of the stock decreases, because the num­ber of shares has increased but the value of the com­pany– its rev­enues– has not changed. How­ever, if that same com­pany later increases its rev­enues, or if shares of stock are taken out of cir­cu­la­tion, the value of each share of stock will increase. The value of the dol­lar can change in a sim­i­lar manner.

1933, by the way, is when the United States made indi­vid­ual own­er­ship of gold ille­gal and began to move away from a gold-backed cur­rency. Alan Greenspan once said this about the gold standard:

…under the gold stan­dard, a free bank­ing sys­tem stands as the pro­tec­tor of an economy’s sta­bil­ity and bal­anced growth… The aban­don­ment of the gold stan­dard made it pos­si­ble for the wel­fare sta­tists to use the bank­ing sys­tem as a means to an unlim­ited expan­sion of credit… In the absence of the gold stan­dard, there is no way to pro­tect sav­ings from con­fis­ca­tion through inflation.

There is one other impor­tant item. Dur­ing the course of the oil shocks of the 1970’s, Pres­i­dent Nixon man­aged to con­vince Saudi Ara­bia and Iran (and thus OPEC) to accept only U.S. dol­lars as pay­ment for oil. This link between oil and the dol­lar is very impor­tant today. The dol­lar is now essen­tially backed by oil, rather than gold. Because of this, a weak dol­lar means expen­sive oil, and sec­ond, the U.S. must main­tain good rela­tions with Saudi Ara­bia so that Saudi and OPEC con­tinue their dol­lar pol­icy. If OPEC were to accept other cur­ren­cies, the dol­lar would loose much of its value. (In 2007, Iran attacked the U.S. dol­lar by accept­ing other currencies.)

Okay. Now comes the hard part– decid­ing on a mon­e­tary pol­icy.
I’ve shown that deficit spend­ing causes infla­tion. I’ve talked about how the value of the dol­lar changes in the mar­ket­place, and how to drive the value up or down. Mon­e­tary pol­icy is choos­ing a strong dol­lar or a weak dol­lar policy.

If you want cheap imports, cheap oil, cheap for­eign vaca­tions, decreas­ing U.S. exports and man­u­fac­tur­ing jobs to flow out of the United States, you want a strong dol­lar. If you want expen­sive imports, expen­sive oil, expen­sive for­eign vaca­tions, domes­tic man­u­fac­tur­ing jobs and increas­ing U.S. exports, you want a weak dollar.

Next essay: Mon­e­tary pol­icy. Stay tuned!

Events at the Olympics

August 18th, 2008 § 3

A few of the events at 2008 Olympic games in Bei­jing have caught my eye, namely: Bad­minton, BMX Rac­ing (yes, with motor­cy­cles), Hand­ball, Rhyth­mic Gym­nas­tics and Tram­po­line. Note­wor­thy, base­ball and soft­ball make their last show­ing in Bei­jing.
Now, I enjoy the Olympic games, and I admire the incred­i­ble ath­leti­cism of the com­peti­tors, but some of these– are they really Olympic events? My per­sonal opin­ion was that the Olympics were an ath­letic com­pe­ti­tion, mano y mano, as it were. I’m not sure BMX rac­ing or Tram­po­line fit in with my view.
So… fine. What else can we do at the Olympics? Mat­tress jump­ing? Team C++ cod­ing? Run­ning with Scis­sors? Blind­folded Traf­fic Dodg­ing? (Los Ange­les has a num­ber of venues avail­able right now for train­ing…) How about Team Syn­chro­nized Blind­folded Mat­tress Jump­ing with Scis­sors? Good stuff, there! Boy, if we could only throw in chain­saw jug­gling and flam­ing hoops, we’d have it for sure. I’d pay to watch that event.

Recommended gear

August 18th, 2008 § 0

An unpaid announce­ment. I haven’t gone corporate.

About a month ago, when climb­ing Mt. Olym­pus, I lost one of my favorite pieces of out­side gear– the Garmin 101. The Garmin 101 is a wrist-worn GPS unit, opti­mized for run­ning. I got it a a gift, and was sur­prised at how much I liked it. Until that point, I had thought of GPS units as play­things for peo­ple who failed Cub Scouts.

Sadly, at the sum­mit of Mt. Olym­pus, the Garmin took a header. As I was pulling on my pack, slid­ing my left arm through the shoul­der loop, the Garmin caught on the strap, held for a moment against the strain, and then popped off the wrist band. It sailed high into the air… and over the cliff. Gone.

It only took a few weeks for me real­ize that I missed the Garmin. I liked hav­ing it report and record my dis­tances, speeds and so forth. It was a use­ful piece of equip­ment that I had come to trust. I had taken it on marathons, hikes and many a morn­ing run. It had become a piece of equip­ment to Don’t Leave Home Without.

So I recently pur­chased the Garmin 205. This is a newer gen­er­a­tion, and is much faster at acquir­ing and hold­ing satel­lite lock. It’s got a more com­fort­able form fac­tor, and it does more stuff. It has built-in modes for bik­ing and hik­ing, in addi­tion to run­ning. Bet­ter yet, it’s got a lower pro­file, and thus less likely to snag on ran­dom things like back­pack straps. I’ve already come to like the 205 more than the 101. Recommended.

The American Experience

August 16th, 2008 § 0

From 1862 (the Civil War) to 1973, the United States had some form of draft for mil­i­tary ser­vice.
Just for review, in that 90 year period the United States fought:

  • The Civil War (1861–1865)
  • The Spanish-American war (1898, “Remem­ber the Maine!”)
  • World War I (1914–1918, though the U.S. didn’t really get involved until 1917)
  • World War II (1939–1945, though the U.S. again was late to the party but ended things with a bang)
  • Korean War (1950–1953)
  • Viet­nam (1960–1975, tak­ing over from the French)

Mil­lions of peo­ple, mostly young men, were inducted into mil­i­tary ser­vice through the draft. Dur­ing World War II, 200,000 per month were drafted. Ulti­mately, twelve per­cent of the U.S. pop­u­la­tion served in the mil­i­tary dur­ing World War II (16 mil­lion from a total pop­u­la­tion of 130 mil­lion). Pres­i­dent Nixon dis­con­tin­ued the draft, with con­scrip­tion ulti­mately end­ing in 1973.

I don’t intend a his­tory les­son, but it is impor­tant to know what has gone before so I can make my point.

This long period of com­pul­sory ser­vice, with mil­lions serv­ing, forced Amer­i­cans to expe­ri­ence each other. Over the decades, an Amer­i­can con­scious­ness was forged. Amer­i­cans came to know one another– the farmer in Kansas had an idea of what New York was like, because he had known a buddy or two from New York. A dock worker in Seat­tle knew some­thing of life in Florida, because his CO was now a store keeper in Miami. Mil­i­tary ser­vice had a way of mak­ing peo­ple get to know one another.

Amer­i­cans were a diverse group of peo­ple in the 1950’s, but there were cer­tain things that were sim­ply just under­stood. Vic­tory in the Cold War would have been unlikely with­out this shared, Amer­i­can, expe­ri­ence. Every­body knew the Rus­sians were scary.

Now, with the draft ended, there is no Amer­i­can Expe­ri­ence. The clos­est we have today is the Col­lege Expe­ri­ence, but this is very dif­fer­ent. Despite their attempts at diver­sity, uni­ver­si­ties will attract cer­tain types of peo­ple. Har­vard will attract not only the very sharp minds, but the very sharp minds of a cer­tain social per­sua­sion. The same with Cal­Tech and MIT, Notre Dame, Bay­lor or BYU. The mil­i­tary itself has become a vol­un­teer ser­vice, attract­ing those that believe mil­i­tary ser­vice is impor­tant. Since 1973 the Amer­i­can con­scious­ness, the men­tal pic­ture a given indi­vid­ual has of the needs and wants of the coun­try as a whole, has been slowly erod­ing away.

The out­come is pre­dictable. Those that do not go to col­lege will find them­selves in the lower income groups, dis­cour­aged at being shut out of the Amer­i­can Dream (I’m being very suc­cinct, I know). Those that go to col­lege will have years of expe­ri­ence with peo­ple like them­selves– and end up mis­tak­enly believ­ing that all Amer­i­cans share per­spec­tives and beliefs sim­i­lar to their own. Polar­iza­tion of belief, and decreased will­ing­ness to under­stand other per­spec­tives, will become the sta­tus quo.

As fea­tured in many films involv­ing World War II, there was always the guy from Brook­lyn. But what hap­pens to New York when the day comes that nobody gets to know that guy? Do New York­ers then become a peo­ple dis­tant from Los Ange­lenos? More likely, assisted by the Inter­net, we will see an increas­ing social frag­men­ta­tion not by region but by intel­lec­tual bent.

What will the future Amer­i­can Expe­ri­ence be? I wel­come comments.

I am a photographer

August 6th, 2008 § 0

A few days ago, I drove up to Alta in Lit­tle Cot­ton­wood Canyon. My inten­tion was to take some pic­tures, like this one.
I know, after look­ing at that photo, it seems rather pre­ten­tious of me, think­ing I can do some­thing that good… but still, a man should have goals.
Alta is my pre­ferred ski resort. I love it, not the least because board­ers are not allowed. I’ve been there many times, and I knew where I wanted to take my shots.
After park­ing my car– far down from where I should have been, it turns out– and hik­ing my way across the now-grassy ski runs, I finally saw my cho­sen place. I took a num­ber of pho­tos as I made my way up. Saw lots of deer, and found myself sad that I was about a week late for most of the flow­ers.
Sud­denly, twi­light was upon me. Alpen­glow set­tled upon the moun­tains, and I was not where I wanted to be. I ran for it– straight up the boulder-strewn moun­tain­side, rather than tak­ing the longer (but safer) trail.
Halfway up– that is to say, right in the mid­dle of the boul­der field– the rock beneath my right foot rolled away as I pushed off. I went fly­ing, cam­era in hand.
My expen­sive, unpro­tected cam­era in hand.
I reacted with­out think­ing. My right arm swung the cam­era back and away from the rapidly approach­ing gran­ite rocks. At the last moment, I real­ized I should do some­thing about my face, so my left hand came back and cov­ered my face.
I hit the rocks. No time to “tuck and roll”, my friends.

There is some­thing you should know about this gran­ite. Tech­ni­cally, it is quartz mon­zonite, not gran­ite. Quartz mon­zonite has a lower pro­por­tion of quartz than true gran­ite. Mean­ing, there is pro­por­tion­ally more feldspar in it. Feldspar crys­tals, with­out get­ting to pedan­tic, cleave in ways which cre­ate sharp points and edges. In layman’s terms, the bro­ken, frac­tured rocks which greeted my plum­met­ing body were nat­ural cheese graters.

My left arm hit first, directly trans­fer­ring energy from my elbow into my ribs. Things inside my body popped and snapped.
My left leg smashed into a pointy (par­don the tech­ni­cal term) rock. In ret­ro­spect, I believe my left leg was still in motion, swing­ing for­ward to com­pen­sate for the rad­i­cal rear­ward accel­er­a­tion of my right leg. The rest of me hit many other sharp pro­tru­sions. My face some­how missed every­thing; my head sim­ply dropped into a space between some rocks– not that this made my neck happy. The wind was knocked out of me, and my chest prob­a­bly suf­fered a seri­ous CPR-like com­pres­sion.
Dam­age assess­ments flowed into my brain. My left leg hurt so badly I was sure it was bro­ken. I laid on the rocks in pain, try­ing to breathe and assessed my situation:

  • pos­si­ble bro­ken leg
  • two or more bro­ken ribs
  • stuck in the mid­dle of a large, sloped boul­der field
  • quickly get­ting dark
  • wear­ing shorts and the tem­per­a­ture is dropping
  • no flash­light
  • is that a wolf howling?

Obvi­ously I was con­cerned, but my cam­era was okay!
Things finally took a turn for the bet­ter. The pain sub­sided. I man­aged to turn over and sit up– no mean feat– and inspect my leg. It was bruised, lac­er­ated and bleed­ing, but not bro­ken. I maneu­vered my way back down to the trail, and thence to a dirt road (where I tried to hitch­hike with some pass­ing trucks, but was ignored) and finally to my car.
I real­ized, as I set­tled into my car, that I had instinc­tively Saved The Cam­era. No thought for the body– Must Save The Cam­era!

I must be a photographer!

And finally, a few pics from the evening– all hand-held HDR:
Devils Castle 1

Devils Castle 2

Devils Castle 3

Alta Sunset 1

Alta Sunset 2

Where am I?

You are currently viewing the archives for August, 2008 at jims musings.